"Know that the people of the South were conquered, and not convinced; and that the authority of the United States was accepted by us from necessity, and not from preference."

Monday, April 13, 2015

Couldn't Have written this any better....thank you Clyde Wilson



http://www.abbevilleinstitute.org/clyde-wilson-library/what-to-say-about-dixie/

Clyde Wilson is a distinguished Professor Emeritus of History at the University of South Carolina where he was the editor of the multivolume The Papers of John C. Calhoun. He is the M.E. Bradford Distinguished Chair at the Abbeville Institute. He is the author or editor of over thirty books and published over 600 articles, essays and reviews. 

Saturday, April 11, 2015

(Or: The Real Cause of the American 'Civil War')
 

By Thomas DiLorenzo        Sh_thead.jpgDon.jpg

This was Abe Lincoln’s moment.  What he was saying was essentially this:
“Here’s the deal.  Slavery is already legal and constitutional under the U.S. system of government, and has been since 1776.  We in the North have no qualms about making slavery “express and irrevocable” right in the text of the U.S. Constitution.  So if you are worried about Northern instigators of slave rebellions, you are mistaken.  Stay in the union and your slave property will continue to be very well  protected.”
“Slavery is a very profitable business, and we in the North intend to share in those profits.  That is one of the main purposes of the Morrill Tariff, which has just more than doubled the average tariff rate.  Since you, the South, export at least three-fourths of all your agricultural products and rely so heavily on foreign trade, we in the North cannot – and will not – tolerate the free-trade policies that you have written into your Confederate Constitution. [The Confederate Constitution outlawed protectionist tariffs altogether].  Free trade in the South, and a 50% tariff rate in the North, the cornerstone of the Republican Party Platform of 1860, will destroy the Northern ports and much of our commerce.  We will not allow this to happen.  We have the willingness and the ability to inflict violence, bloodshed, force, and invasion on the Southern people.  We will not back down this time to the South Carolina tariff nullifiers as my predecessor, President Andrew Jackson did some thirty years ago.”
“We are not being any more greedy here than say, our European counterparts.  We only want to wet our beaks, so to speak, by taxing a portion of your slave profits.  There need not be any violence or bloodshed –as long as you do what we say.”
This is how the Southern politicians understood the motivations of the Yankee political elite in early 1861.  Jefferson Davis himself demonstrated this understanding in his own first inaugural address, delivered in Montomery, Alabama, on February 18, 1861:
“[O]ur true policy is peace, and the freest trade which our necessities will permit . . . and that . . . there should be the fewest practicable restrictions upon the interchange of commodities . . . .  If, however, passion or the lust of dominion should cloud the judgment or inflame the ambition of [the Northern states], we must prepare to meet the emergency and to maintain, by the final arbitrament of the sword, the position we have assumed . . .”
Whatever other reasons some of the Southern states might have given for secession is irrelevant to the question of why there was a war.  Secession does not necessitate war.  Lincoln promised war over tax collection in his first inaugural address.  When the Southern states refused to pay his beloved Morrill Tariff at the Southern ports, he kept his promise of “invasion and bloodshed” and waged war on the Southern states.  No gangster in the history of the world has ever enforced an extortion racket on such a gargantuan scale of death, plunder, and destruction.